![](https://esspots.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/New-Project-80.jpg)
In a stunning move that has left both loyal viewers and industry insiders stunned, CNN has announced the departure of anchor John Berman, citing a need for a more balanced, unbiased approach to its coverage. While the official statements were light on specifics, sources close to the situation have hinted that Berman’s perceived anti-Trump stance and his pro-Harris sentiments may have played a significant role in the network’s decision to move in a new direction.
Berman, who has long been a prominent figure at CNN, co-anchored the network’s morning show, “New Day,” where he was known for his sharp wit, quick reporting, and strong political commentary. However, as CNN continues to evolve in an era where political polarization has reached unprecedented levels, the network appears to be looking to shake off the perception that it leans too heavily in one direction.
Throughout Berman’s tenure, his coverage often focused on challenging former President Donald Trump, offering a critical lens on his policies, leadership style, and controversies. While this is hardly unique in modern media, some critics believed Berman’s style sometimes veered into the realm of blatant bias, particularly during the Trump administration’s final years. His frequent critiques of the former president were seen by some as evidence of CNN’s alignment with the anti-Trump resistance movement that gained momentum throughout the 2010s.
The network’s critics have long accused CNN of tilting too far left in its coverage, and many believe Berman became a symbol of that bias. His sharp takes on Trump’s policies and actions were often paired with glowing praise for Vice President Kamala Harris, who has enjoyed widespread support from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Berman’s apparent favoritism toward Harris and her policies was particularly evident during the 2020 election and subsequent transition of power. At times, Berman’s glowing segments about Harris, which highlighted her groundbreaking achievements and praised her role in American politics, led some viewers to wonder whether CNN had crossed a line into advocacy rather than objective reporting.
Berman’s approach was polarizing; while his supporters admired his commitment to holding power to account, others felt that his strong pro-Harris tone, particularly in the wake of the election, made it difficult for CNN to maintain its reputation for impartiality. For a network already facing accusations of liberal bias, Berman’s position as a major on-air personality made his political views particularly impactful.
In a bid to regain credibility and appeal to a broader audience, CNN seems to be taking its first steps toward moving away from a perceived “woke” agenda that critics say alienated a sizable portion of its audience. In doing so, the network is signaling a shift toward a more balanced approach to coverage, one that will feature a more neutral, less opinionated style of reporting, especially in the realm of politics.
By parting ways with Berman, CNN is likely hoping to distance itself from the perception of being too closely tied to the progressive wing of American politics. The move to hire a more diverse array of anchors — ones less associated with partisan viewpoints — may be seen as an attempt to reach a wider demographic, especially those who felt alienated by the network’s perceived left-leaning bias.
It’s important to note that Berman’s departure is just the beginning of CNN’s new strategy. The network has hinted that it plans to overhaul its programming lineup to include more voices from across the political spectrum. A spokesperson for the network said, “We are committed to providing the most balanced coverage possible. We are excited about the future and the opportunity to present a wider range of viewpoints to our audience.”
However, some are skeptical about whether this shift will be enough to quell the ongoing criticisms of CNN’s bias. The network has long been a target of conservative pundits, who argue that its editorial choices consistently favor liberal perspectives. While CNN executives may hope that distancing themselves from Berman will help mend its relationship with disillusioned viewers, it remains to be seen whether a more neutral approach can genuinely repair the damage done.
Meanwhile, Berman himself has remained tight-lipped about his departure, releasing a brief statement thanking his colleagues and viewers for their support over the years. “It has been an honor to serve as the voice of CNN for so long,” he said. “I wish the network the best as it moves forward with its next chapter.”
The question now remains: will CNN’s move toward a more balanced, non-woke approach help to restore the network’s credibility and appeal to a broader audience? Time will tell. But for now, the departure of John Berman marks a significant shift in the network’s strategy, signaling its desire to reinvent itself in a more polarized media landscape.
As the battle for public trust continues in the world of news media, CNN’s decision may just be the first step in a larger transformation — one that could change the face of American journalism for years to come.
NOTE: This is Satire, It’s Not True.