In recent months, the issue of Pride Night in the NHL has sparked significant controversy, with a growing number of coaches and players voicing their opposition to the events. Among the most notable figures to reject participation are Detroit Red Wings coach Derek Lalonde and Philadelphia Flyers coach John Tortorella. Their stance has ignited a passionate debate about the balance between inclusivity and personal beliefs in professional sports.
Pride Night has been a part of the NHL’s broader effort to promote inclusivity and support for the LGBTQ+ community. These events often include activities such as wearing rainbow-colored jerseys, using Pride-themed equipment, and participating in community outreach. For many, it is seen as a positive gesture toward creating a more welcoming environment for LGBTQ+ athletes and fans. However, the policy has not been without its critics.
Derek Lalonde, the head coach of the Detroit Red Wings, has expressed his reservations about the NHL’s Pride Night initiatives. In October 2023, Lalonde made headlines when he addressed the league’s controversial decision to ban the use of Pride Tape by players. Pride Tape is a rainbow-colored tape that many athletes have used to support LGBTQ+ rights during games. While the NHL had previously allowed players to wear it, the league’s decision to prohibit it sparked outrage among supporters of LGBTQ+ rights, who saw the ban as a step backward.
Lalonde, however, distanced himself from the league’s ban on Pride Tape, asserting that he was an “all-inclusive” person. His comments indicated that he supported inclusivity but felt that the Pride Night events and certain gestures were not necessary for promoting unity in the sport. Lalonde’s stance reflected his belief that the focus of professional sports should remain on the game itself and that players should not be pressured to publicly display support for causes in ways that they might not feel comfortable with.
His views align closely with those of John Tortorella, the coach of the Philadelphia Flyers, who has been vocal in his opposition to Pride Night in the NHL. Tortorella has long been a controversial figure in the league, known for his strong opinions on various issues. He made waves in 2025 when he publicly stated that the Flyers would never participate in NHL Pride Night events, calling it a matter of prioritizing the integrity of the game over symbolic gestures. Tortorella has expressed that his focus is on creating a team environment based on respect and performance, rather than on external social issues.
Both coaches’ comments have drawn the ire of many fans and LGBTQ+ advocates, who argue that Pride Night is an important part of the NHL’s efforts to create a more inclusive and welcoming environment for all players and fans, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. Critics of Lalonde and Tortorella’s positions argue that rejecting Pride Night sends the wrong message about inclusivity in sports, particularly in a league where LGBTQ+ visibility has historically been limited. They contend that by participating in Pride events, the league and its players have the opportunity to demonstrate support for LGBTQ+ communities, showing that everyone, regardless of identity, is welcome in hockey.
However, Lalonde and Tortorella have both framed their positions as a defense of what they see as the core mission of professional sports — the game itself. They have emphasized the need for athletes to focus on their performance and not feel compelled to participate in external causes. For them, Pride Night is seen as an issue that diverts attention away from the primary purpose of sports, which they believe should be about competition and team dynamics. This perspective resonates with some fans and players who feel that sports should remain a space for athletic excellence rather than political or social agendas.
At the same time, the NHL has continued to support its Pride Night initiatives, with various teams holding these events as part of their broader diversity and inclusion efforts. While not every player or coach participates, the league as a whole has been consistent in its support of LGBTQ+ inclusion. The NHL’s commitment to these events reflects its desire to make hockey a more welcoming space for LGBTQ+ individuals, both within the sport and in the fanbase.
Despite the controversy surrounding the coaches’ positions, it is important to note that the issue of LGBTQ+ inclusion in sports is far from black and white. There are many layers to the debate, and different individuals and organizations will have their own perspectives on how best to achieve inclusivity in professional athletics. For some, participation in Pride Night is a meaningful and necessary step in the fight for equality and representation. For others, the focus on inclusivity should not be a distraction from the primary goal of competition and performance.
As the debate continues to unfold, the stance taken by coaches like Lalonde and Tortorella raises important questions about the role of sports in social activism. While the NHL remains committed to its diversity initiatives, the division over Pride Night highlights the complex and often contentious relationship between personal beliefs, team dynamics, and broader societal issues in the world of professional sports.
Whether or not these coaches will change their positions remains to be seen, but their refusal to embrace Pride Night is a significant moment in the ongoing conversation about the intersection of sports and social issues. The NHL, along with other professional leagues, will likely continue to navigate this challenge as they strive to balance inclusivity with the desire to maintain a focus on the competition at the heart of the game.
Note: This is SATIRE, It’s Not TRUE.
